[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] Makefile: add target to clean targetfs
emeric.vigier at savoirfairelinux.com
Thu Mar 12 14:44:07 UTC 2015
On 15-03-10 07:41 PM, Ryan Barnett wrote:
> In the future - could you put a version - such as 'v2' - into the
> title utilizing the -'-subject-prefix' parameter of git-send-email?
I did, using git format-patch:
$ git format-patch -M -n -s --subject-prefix="PATCH v2" -o outgoing
And I see [PATCH v2 1/1] in the title. Did you miss something?
> For details and an example see the buildroot manual and section 21.5.2:
> Would it make sense to also update the section of the manual that
> talks about understand when a full-rebuild is necessary? You could
> also update that section to reference this advance usage section.
I believe so, yes. I'll add a brief scenario in this chapter and see how
I can warn users about package dependencies.
>> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
>> +// -*- mode:doc; -*-
>> +// vim: set syntax=asciidoc:
>> +==== Clean target filesystem
>> +There are various cases where you would like to clean the target
>> +filesystem. Especially once you understood that buildroot build system
>> +is kept simple, and does not allow to uninstall files. Let's take some
>> +1. You enabled +PACKAGE_OPENSSH+ to have a SSH server running on your
>> + board. But you figure out that +sshd+ does not run well on your
>> + target's architecture. Thus you decide to disable +PACKAGE_OPENSSH+
>> + and enable +PACKAGE_DROPBEAR+ instead. You run +make+, +openssh+
Oops, small typo here:
-and enable +PACKAGE_DROPBEAR+ instead. You run +make+, +openssh+
+and enable +PACKAGE_DROPBEAR+ instead. You run +make+, +dropbear+
>> + gets built and installed. Problem: +openssh+ files are still present
>> + in +output/target+!
> One case that comes to mind here is that will this ensure that
> packages are installed in the correct order with dependencies? I am
> not exactly sure how the dependencies for packages works, but if you
> remove all the '.stamp_target_install' will that ensure that all the
> packages get installed in the correct order?
> Busybox is the package that comes to my mind first that we need to
> ensure the installation order. From testing your scenario outlined
> above it appears that busybox gets installed before even dropbear
> would get built which would ensure that any full version of busybox
> would get install correctly over the symlinks to busybox.
>> +2. You enabled +PACKAGE_NTPD+ and set the local timezone to
>> + +America/Montreal+ with +BR2_TARGET_LOCALTIME+ config. Then you find
>> + out that +Montreal+ local has been replaced by +Toronto+ (French
>> + looks like a rogue language). You enter +make menuconfig+, make the
>> + change, save, and run +make+ again. Problem:
>> + +output/target/etc/timezone+ still has +America/Montreal+ content!
>> +Solution to this is either to identify which package to reconfigure, or
> I believe this first 'or' should be removed so that the sentence would read:
> The solution to this is to either identify which package to
> reconfigure, remove files manually, or destroy the target filesystem
> and recreate it.
Ok, I'll fix that.
>> +remove files manually, or destroy the target filesystem and recreate it.
>> +This latter option is convenient: you don't have to care about which
>> +packages to rebuild, and it is fast. Here is how to recreate your
>> +target filesystem, and get rid of filesystem _stains_:
>> +make clean-target
>> ++clean-target+ removes +output/target+, tells buildroot to recreate the
>> +target skeleton, and install each package again.
> This is a rather simple solution to the issue of recreating a 'clean'
> target filesystem so it will be interesting to hear what the
> maintainers (Peter/Thomas P) opinions are on this patch.
More information about the buildroot