[Buildroot] Location of bootloader files [was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] at91bootstrap3: bump to v3.6.2]
thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com
Tue Jun 17 07:35:02 UTC 2014
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 23:56:27 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> > Some of the bootloaders install their files in a sub-directory of
> > $(BINARIES_DIR) (for example rpi-userland, syslinux...), while others
> > (such as this one) install their files directly in $(BINARIES_DIR), and
> > still others install their files in $(TARGET_DIR)/boot (eg. grub.)
> > Sometime ago, I proposed a patch to install the rpi-userland files in
> > $(TARGET_DIR)/boot, but that was refused, on the principle that the boot
> > partition should not necesarily be exposed/mounted on the running
> > system. That's however what grub1 does.
> I think for most bootloaders, it just doesn't make sense to install them inside
> the target rootfs, because the (ROM) bootloader anyway can't access these files
> there. Grub is special because the actual bootloader is created by a separate
> installer. For the other bootloaders, there is IMHO no point at all to install
> the bootloader in the target filesystem.
Fully agreed. Most ARM SoCs capable of loading the bootloader for
MMC/eMMC require the bootloader to be stored in a FAT (often FAT16)
filesystem. And such a filesystem cannot be used to store the root
filesystem. So you necessarily need to have at least two partitions:
one FAT partition with the bootloader, and one ext2/3/4 partition (or
any other filesystem) for the root filesystem. So as Arnout says, there
absolutely no point in having the bootloaders installed *inside* the
There are also some other SoCs where the bootloaders are not even
inside a root filesystem: you have to write the bootloader image, raw,
somewhere at the beginning of the MMC/eMMC storage (not exactly at the
beginning, as it would overwrite the partition table, but somewhere
after the first sector, but before the start of the first partition). I
*think* i.MX28 might be in this category, but it's mainly my colleague
Maxime Ripard who did some i.MX28 stuff, so I might remember incorrect
So really, Grub is the exception here, not the rule.
> > - if installing files in $(BINARIES_DIR), should we instate a policy
> > to install them in a sub-dir? What shall that sub-dir be named?
> > Currently, when followed, the behaviour is to install in a sub-dir
> > named after the bootloader (eg. $(BINARIES_DIR)/rpi-userland).
> > Should we stick to that, or just name that directory
> > $(BINARIES_DIR)/boot ?
> I don't think $(BINARIES_DIR)/boot is a good place, because that should contain
> everything except the boot loader :-). Also, if you want to do that, you
> probably also want to put the kernel and DTB there. And then there's nothing
> left in $(BINARIES_DIR)...
I'm also unsure we should do something other than what we do currently.
The user generally ends up with very few files in $(BINARIES_DIR), so
it's pretty obvious what to do. The readme.txt for each board gives
some additional details. We could always decide to have certain
packages install a README.<bootloader> file in $(BINARIES_DIR) with
some references/details on how to use the binaries installed here, but
I'm not even sure that's really necessary.
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
More information about the buildroot