[Buildroot] [git commit] erlang: use libatomic_ops if available

Peter Korsgaard peter at korsgaard.com
Tue Dec 16 12:41:33 UTC 2014


>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com> writes:

 > Hello,
 > On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:36:24 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote:

 >> Erlang can either provide its own atomic_ops implementation or use the
 >> one in libatomic_ops. This patch ensures that it only uses the one from
 >> libatomic_ops if it is available.

 > Is this really what we want to do? In such cases, we normally always
 > force to use the "system" version of the library rather than the
 > built-in one. Why should Erlang be treated differently, especially if
 > using the "system" version of the library works fine?

So in other words, make erlang select libatomic_ops? That sounds fine to
me.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard 



More information about the buildroot mailing list