[Buildroot] [git commit] erlang: use libatomic_ops if available
peter at korsgaard.com
Tue Dec 16 12:41:33 UTC 2014
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com> writes:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:36:24 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> Erlang can either provide its own atomic_ops implementation or use the
>> one in libatomic_ops. This patch ensures that it only uses the one from
>> libatomic_ops if it is available.
> Is this really what we want to do? In such cases, we normally always
> force to use the "system" version of the library rather than the
> built-in one. Why should Erlang be treated differently, especially if
> using the "system" version of the library works fine?
So in other words, make erlang select libatomic_ops? That sounds fine to
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
More information about the buildroot