[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] omniorb: add COS Naming Service
Thomas De Schampheleire
patrickdepinguin at gmail.com
Wed Nov 13 09:59:43 UTC 2013
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet at uclibc.org> wrote:
>>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin at gmail.com> writes:
>> Yuk, that's a pity...
>> In this case my preference is to have the comment before the main
>> option (so as close as possible), rather than after all sub options.
>> What is your opinion?
> I don't have a stong opion about it, but that's fine by me as well. For
> simple packages (most), it imho is a bit more logical to have it after
> the option though (and it's what we are currently doing most places).
As long as there are no suboptions that is indeed more logical.
However, when suboptions are added the comment moves down, and
depending on where new suboptions are added this may not be apparent
from the diff output alone. So one way is to use one 'rule' which
would be the comment above, or we keep simple packages without
suboptions with the comment below, and make sure the comment is moved
to the top when suboptions are added. The first alternative is easier
to maintain, but less beautiful for the simple packages without
If I had to pick, I'd pick the first alternative, for easier
maintainability and uniformity.
More information about the buildroot