[Buildroot] Patchwork oldest patches cleanup #2 (deadline November 17)
arnout at mind.be
Mon Nov 4 21:40:10 UTC 2013
On 04/11/13 12:17, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> Hi Arnout,
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout at mind.be> wrote:
>> On 01/11/13 16:09, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
>>> linux: add default defconfig
>>> Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout at mind.be>
>> This one didn't receive positive feedback, so I guess it's rejected. Short
>> recap: it allows you to build the kernel with the architecture's default
>> defconfig, which is typically a bloaty configuration that supports many
>> boards (if an appropriate device tree is present). IIRC the feedback was
>> that this wasn't usually appropriate for buildroot use cases.
> One annoyance I have is that if you want to quickly test something
> (for example when reviewing patches) and you enable a Linux kernel,
> you also have to specify a defconfig. Your patch would fix that use
> case. In such a test case, I typically don't care what is included in
> the kernel, because I would only compile-test.
I completely agree, that was the reason that I created the patch in the
Unfortunately, the x86_defconfig is _huge_. And as mentioned by
ThomasP, the other architecture's defconfigs aren't worth much. So I
don't think this patch is really valuable after all.
> But I can also follow ThomasP's comments on that patch.
> There was a suggestion in case of x86 though, which in many cases
> would be ok for me in the above scenario. I wouldn't be against having
> just that...
> Best regards,
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
More information about the buildroot