[Buildroot] [PATCH v3 6/7] toolchain: uclibc does not support microblze
spenser at gillilanding.com
Wed Nov 13 22:35:33 UTC 2013
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 22:58 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Spenser Gilliland,
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:28:49 -0600, Spenser Gilliland wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Spenser Gilliland <spenser at gillilanding.com>
> > ---
> > toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in | 1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in
> > index 1529004..57bbc3d 100644
> > --- a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in
> > +++ b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ choice
> > config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_UCLIBC
> > bool "uClibc"
> > select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC
> > + depends on !BR2_microblaze
> Hum, I see a libc/sysdeps/linux/microblaze in my uClibc tree. And also,
> since there are some no-MMU variant of Microblaze processors, which C
> library other than uClibc could they use?
In the distant past there may have been a version of uclibc that worked
with microblaze. However from my limited testing, the current toolchain
does not work with uclibc.
> That being said, I don't *require* you to add the support for uClibc.
> Having glibc/eglibc support is already good. We can add uClibc support
> later on.
IIT ECASP Lab
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the buildroot