[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] openpgm: new package
alexander.lukichev at gmail.com
Tue Feb 12 10:08:07 UTC 2013
Hi, Thomas, All!
On 02/11/2013 04:14 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>>> unclear if we should choose libpgm or openpgm. Does the openpgm
>>> projects delivers something else than libpgm?
>> Not as far as I know.
Well, actually yes. It's mostly libpgm but there are also bindings for Perl and GStreamer.
> Then maybe we want to call the package libpgm ?
It is referenced from ZeroMQ (in everything, including scripts and documentation) as OpenPGM. I don't know about other packages using it, though.
It is also referenced from inside the package itself (the subdir is openpgm/pgm/ etc). It seems that only the archive and installed library files have libpgm in their names: everything else is named openpgm.
So, I'll do what you and the community advise but I'd rather call it "OpenPGM implementation of libpgm".
More information about the buildroot