[Buildroot] Buildroot 2010.05-rc3 released uClibc 0.9.30.1 patches missing ?
microbit at virginbroadband.com.au
Thu May 27 21:32:12 UTC 2010
Bonjour Yann, tout le monde,
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 23:19 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Kris, All,
> On Thursday 27 May 2010 23:11:17 Microbit_Ubuntu wrote:
> > I don;t know if I'm off base here, but I notice that rc3 does not have
> > the patches for uClibc 0.9.30.1 at toolchain/uClibc folder in the
> > tarball ?????
> Indeed, that because the 0.9.30.x that is used is .3, and .1 is not present
> in the version choice, in the menuconfig. See:
> toolchain/uClibc/Config.in at 40
> Yann E. MORIN.
Thanks for reviewing.
This might have sounded like a dumb question - as of course uClibc was
compiled by ct-ng...
I haven't yet compiled BR, am about to though. I saw uClibc 0.1.29
patches, so I thought "where's 0.9.30.1 ??".
I mean, if 0.9.30.3 is used, why bother with 0.9.29 patches ???
Oh well, false alarm in any case !!
The *biggest* problem so far I had was the fact that ct-ng-1.6.1 patches
uClibc 0.9.30.1 BUT does NOT apply the ARM sysdep patch.
I kept getting "invalid module format" on my target. A rebuild with
(indeed) "new" linuxthreads enabled in uClibc of the x-tools toolchain
fixed it after manually applying the sysdeps patch !!
I'll still reply to your other post as well.
More information about the buildroot