[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package: multimedia/alsa-lib python
ulf.samuelsson at atmel.com
Mon Jan 26 19:01:02 UTC 2009
mån 2009-01-26 klockan 16:40 +0100 skrev Peter Korsgaard:
> >>>>> "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard <jacmet at uclibc.org> writes:
> ulf> http://www.alsa-project.org/
> ulf> +
> ulf> +config BR2_PACKAGE_ALSA_LIB_PYTHON
> ulf> + bool "Python support for alsa-lib"
> ulf> + depends on BR2_PACKAGE_ALSA_LIB
> ulf> + select BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON
> Peter> It would probably be goodt to add a 'default BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON' line,
> Peter> so it defaults to enabled if you have python support, and false
> Peter> otherwise.
> Peter> Alternatively it should depend on BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON and just be
> Peter> default y, as it's probably pretty unlikely someone wants python
> Peter> support in alsa without having python enabled in the first place.
> Peter> The 2nd option seems cleanest to me, what do you think?
I think feedback was that people would like the option to build alsa-lib
WITHOUT python support even if python was on the target.
Adding python to alsa-lib means a fat library is added to the fs.
More information about the buildroot