[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package/libsexy

Ulf Samuelsson ulf.samuelsson at atmel.com
Fri Jan 23 21:06:16 UTC 2009


fre 2009-01-23 klockan 19:48 +0100 skrev Peter Korsgaard:
> >>>>> "ulf" == ulf  <ulf at uclibc.org> writes:
> 
>  ulf> Author: ulf
>  ulf> Date: 2009-01-23 17:48:49 +0000 (Fri, 23 Jan 2009)
>  ulf> New Revision: 24982
> 
>  ulf> Log:
>  ulf> Disable libsexy (with comment) if X is not available
> 
>  ulf> Modified:
>  ulf>    trunk/buildroot/package/libsexy/Config.in
> 
>  ulf> Changeset:
>  ulf> Modified: trunk/buildroot/package/libsexy/Config.in
>  ulf> ===================================================================
>  ulf> --- trunk/buildroot/package/libsexy/Config.in	2009-01-23 13:12:57 UTC (rev 24981)
>  ulf> +++ trunk/buildroot/package/libsexy/Config.in	2009-01-23 17:48:49 UTC (rev 24982)
>  ulf> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>  ulf>  config BR2_PACKAGE_LIBSEXY
>  ulf>  	bool "libsexy"
>  ulf>  	depends on BR2_PACKAGE_LIBGTK2
>  ulf> +	depends on !BR2_PACKAGE_XSERVER_none
> 
> According to the makefile it seems like there's a:
> 
> select BR2_PACKAGE_XLIB_LIBX11
> 
> missing.
> 
> But from doing a quick grep in the libsexy sources I don't see
> any X includes, so are you sure it doesn't work with
> gtk-over-directfb?
> 


Not 100% sure, but it does not work as it is today due to:
LIBSEXY_DEPENDENCIES = xlib_libX11 libgtk2



> >From a quick look at configure.ac, it seems to check for:
> 
> pango >= 1.4.0, glib-2.0 >= 2.4.0, gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0, libxml-2.0
> 
> The first 3 are covered by the gtk2 dependency, but libxml2 isn't.
> 

Feel free to update.


>  ulf>  	help
>  ulf>  	  libsexy is a collection of GTK+ widgets that extend the
>  ulf>  	  functionality of such standard widgets as GtkEntry and
>  ulf> @@ -8,3 +9,7 @@
>  ulf>  	  limitations of the widgets.
>  
>  ulf>  	  http://www.chipx86.com/wiki/Libsexy
>  ulf> +
>  ulf> +comment "libsexy       - disabled (requires X-Windows)"
>  ulf> +	depends on BR2_PACKAGE_XSERVER_none
>  ulf> +
> 
> We don't normally do that for X-only stuff. Long term, we should
> probably move X apps to a seperate menu.
> 

Sounds OK to me.

BR
Ulf Samuelsson



More information about the buildroot mailing list