[PATCH] Revert "parser_config.[ch]: remove duplicated hidden functions"

[Vineet Gupta]

On 05/07/2013 10:02 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On May 6, 2013, at 9:10 PM, Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1 at synopsys.com> wrote:
>
>>> This attribute_hidden should not be resurrected.
>> Is this because uClibc convention is to specify this only with prototypes which is
>> already being done.
> is it possible to rename the conflicting functions in busy box?

I suppose we could - but the hidden proto for these still has value in that PLT
can be avoided for calls within uClibc.

-Vineet