[PATCH] Revert "parser_config.[ch]: remove duplicated hidden functions"

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Tue May 7 04:32:57 UTC 2013


On May 6, 2013, at 9:10 PM, Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1 at synopsys.com> wrote:

>> This attribute_hidden should not be resurrected.
> 
> Is this because uClibc convention is to specify this only with prototypes which is
> already being done.

is it possible to rename the conflicting functions in busy box?


More information about the uClibc mailing list