[PATCH] fcntl cleanup

[Peter Mazinger]

Hi,

> The code in the future branch is much better organized but it
> still relies on the fcntl syscall which may not exist. It also
> tests for the fctnl64 locking commands unnecessarily for some
> configurations.

I can't see, what should happen, when fcntl[64] are not available. Are you thinking of some fallback function to implement it?

Which configurations do not have the above named lockings? I have looked at them and the only thing I know might be, that the naming is different, but the "numbering" can be used for 32/64 bit cases.

Since I (re)wrote that part, I am interested in implementing it better

Thanks, Peter
-- 
NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone!                                  
Jetzt informieren: http://mobile.1und1.de/?ac=OM.PW.PW003K20328T7073a