[patch] ioperm/iopl redefinition on arm

[Jason Woodward]

Mike,

> > > libc/libc_so.a(stubs.os): In function `sync_file_range':
> > > stubs.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `ioperm'
> > > libc/libc_so.a(ioperm.os):ioperm.c:(.text+0x260): first defined here
> > > libc/libc_so.a(stubs.os): In function `sync_file_range':
> > > stubs.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `iopl'
> > > libc/libc_so.a(iopl.os):iopl.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here
> > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > > make[1]: *** [lib/libc.so] Error 1
> > 
> > i don't think this is correct.  the arm-specific ioperm.c code should
> > always be used.  the stubs code should not attempt to provide one.  if you
> > read the arm code you'd see that it doesn't use the syscall anywhere.
> 
> i've pushed a fix that should disable the stubs for arm.  please verify.

Thanks.  This seems to work just fine on the various targets I've
built and boot tested.


take care,
jason