kernel_types.h really needed ?

Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org
Tue Jan 24 02:17:12 UTC 2012


On Monday 23 January 2012 13:26:44 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> I'm wondering if we do still need to have in uclibc a version of
> kernel_types.h, any idea ?

the alternative is ... ?  relying on linux/types.h ?  if we don't care about 
things older than like linux-2.6.18, then we prob can drop kernel_types.h.  
but i suspect some people do care about older targets.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20120123/27152410/attachment.asc>


More information about the uClibc mailing list