Future branch status

[Khem Raj]

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Peter Mazinger <ps.m at gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> which 3 patches produce the regressions?

The real problem is in first one other two are just dependent on it.
so they are removed but first one shows up the real problem.

http://uclibc.org/~kraj/future-rebase/0368-hide-locking-related-pthread-functions-in-libc.so.patch

http://uclibc.org/~kraj/future-rebase/0387-linuxthreads.old-hide-a-bunch-of-functions.patch

http://uclibc.org/~kraj/future-rebase/0393-fix-the-different-views-of-the-cleanup-functions.patch


> Is the arm/mips/ppc problem an endianness only problem (does it work on LE but not on BE)?

arm is LE other two are BE

>
> Thanks, Peter
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>> Datum: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:45:22 -0700
>> Von: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
>> An: uClibc list <uclibc at uclibc.org>
>> CC: Peter Mazinger <ps.m at gmx.net>
>> Betreff: Future branch status
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I have been trying to sanitize future branch and keep it rebased on
>> top of master
>> however the branch does introduce regressions. I have identified 3 patches
>> which
>> lets me boot x11 image on x86 and x86_64 but arm, mips and ppc are still a
>> no go
>> it boots into console fine but not the x11 image which otherwise boots
>> fine on top
>> of current master so I consider this as a regression.
>>
>> The branch however does have some interesting fixes. So I am going to
>> merge the
>> bug fixes and trivial fixes first and primarily which dont regress.
>>
>> My tree is here
>>
>> https://github.com/kraj/uClibc
>>
>> which is future branch rebased on top of master.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Khem
>
> --
> NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone!
> Jetzt informieren: http://mobile.1und1.de/?ac=OM.PW.PW003K20328T7073a
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc