ldd is not honoring LD_LIBRARY_PATH

[u-uclibc-y2lt at aetey.se]

Hi Carmelo,

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:21:24PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> I could agree with you, but one of the big concerns I often see (even in
> the embedded world) with customers when trying to pushing them to
> migrate fro a glibc based system to uClibc is about "compatibility" in
> the most extended meaning. This is just one example.
> 
> I'm strongly convinced that this is key in supporting the adoption of
> uClibc vs glibc.

Unfortunately it makes uClibc become slightly more similar to glibc
in size and complexity, too.

I agree though that compatibility with [de-facto standards like] glibc
is useful. Thus, indeed, why not let ldd do some extra stuff when this
does not cost too much.

Regards,
Rune