timerfd incompatibility on mips

[Alexander Gordeev]

В Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:53:39 -0800 (PST)
Davide Libenzi <davidel at xmailserver.org> пишет:

> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I've just found a problem with TFD_NONBLOCK flag that can be passed to
> > timerfd_create.
> > 
> > <uclibc>/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/sys/timerfd.h which is installed
> > to /usr/include/sys/timerfd.h defines TFD_NONBLOCK as 04000 ie 0x800.
> > BTW glibc/eglibc headers do the same thing.
> > 
> > <linux>/include/linux/timerfd.h declares it as O_NONBLOCK which is
> > defined in fcntl.h. Usually O_NONBLOCK is 0x800 too but some
> > architectures including MIPS it redefine it:
> > 
> > arch/mips/include/asm/fcntl.h:#define O_NONBLOCK	0x0080
> > arch/alpha/include/asm/fcntl.h:#define O_NONBLOCK	00004
> > arch/sparc/include/asm/fcntl.h:#define O_NONBLOCK	0x4000
> > arch/parisc/include/asm/fcntl.h:#define O_NONBLOCK	000200004
> > 
> > My tests show that kernel thinks that TFD_NONBLOCK is 0x80 on MIPS. I
> > get what I want when I pass 0x80 and EINVAL when I pass 0x800. I don't
> > know why there are such uncertain things in Linux. Probably the problem
> > should be fixed in the kernel.
> > 
> > Right now one cannot use timerfd_create(..., TFD_NONBLOCK) on MIPS but
> > can use timerfd_create(..., O_NONBLOCK) instead.
> 
> Ther kernel definition (include/linux/timerfd.h) maps it directly to 
> O_NONBLOCK, but I am noticing that glibc bolt in the value.
> I don't think this is a kernel fix.

Yes, but linux/timerfd.h is not installed so timerfd.h from *libc
cannot include it. So adding it to include/linux/Kbuild would be a
first step to make them not hard-code the value. Right?

-- 
  Alexander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20110128/ef2e1d60/attachment.asc>