[PATCH 00/11] Patches for resolver functions support

Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amoroso at st.com
Fri Aug 26 12:55:29 UTC 2011


On 26/08/2011 9.52, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:54:32AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> <rep.dot.nop at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 18, 2011 10:03 AM, "Daniel Mack" <zonque at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Any opinions about this patch set, anyone?
>>>
>>> Looks good, I will apply it asap.
>>> Thanks!
>>
>> Apperantly, this didn't happen yet?
> 
> right, sorry.
>>
>> I'd also appreciate some more test coverage for possible regressions :)
> 
> I have pushed them now. Thanks!

Hello,
I'm having some problem in building now NPTL without RESOLVER.
I've fixed one of this problem (not yet pushed), but other appeared
(basically __resp variable is not longer visible).
So for now, NPTL requires RESOLVER.

I'll look at this next week.

cheers,
carmelo

> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
> 



More information about the uClibc mailing list