1.0 release?

[Natanael Copa]

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
<rep.dot.nop at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 10:51:53PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>>On (10/05/10 00:02), Rob Landley wrote:
>>> So now that NPTL is in, it sounds like the next release should be either 1.0
>>> or 1.0-pre.  It is more or less feature complete, isn't it?
>>
>>yeah I have mentioned it on IRC couple of times to have next release be 1.0
>
> the nptl addition would warrant bumping the version to 0.10.0, yes.
> I don't think messing around with the major version and thus
> UCLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER is justified for mere cosmetic numbers.

Its easy to keep the dynamic linker even if you bump major version:

diff --git a/Rules.mak b/Rules.mak
index fd0de49..8ff9f2d 100644
--- a/Rules.mak
+++ b/Rules.mak
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ MINOR_VERSION := 9
 SUBLEVEL      := 32
 EXTRAVERSION  :=-git
 VERSION       := $(MAJOR_VERSION).$(MINOR_VERSION).$(SUBLEVEL)
-ABI_VERSION   := $(MAJOR_VERSION)
+ABI_VERSION   := 0
 ifneq ($(EXTRAVERSION),)
 VERSION       := $(VERSION)$(EXTRAVERSION)
 endif