1.0 release?

Mon May 10 11:22:07 UTC 2010

On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 10:51:53PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>On (10/05/10 00:02), Rob Landley wrote:
>> So now that NPTL is in, it sounds like the next release should be either 1.0 
>> or 1.0-pre.  It is more or less feature complete, isn't it?
>
>yeah I have mentioned it on IRC couple of times to have next release be 1.0

the nptl addition would warrant bumping the version to 0.10.0, yes.
I don't think messing around with the major version and thus
UCLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER is justified for mere cosmetic numbers.