various nptl patches

Rob Landley rob at landley.net
Sun May 2 00:57:39 UTC 2010


On Monday 26 April 2010 00:43:35 Timo Teräs wrote:
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >>>> So this is what I came up with. I do wonder if not linux_resolver
> >>>> need PROTECTED support too? Have you tested with LAZY relocation too?
> >>>
> >>> Have not tested lazy yet.
> >>
> >> The LAZY relocs is a bigger problem though. That has to work so it would
> >> be great if you could test that too.
> >
> > Hi Timo, did you get a chance to test LAZY relocs too? Now that
> > NPTL is in main line it would be good to know if PROTECTED works
> > as is or if more work is needed.
>
> Tested them now. LAZY works as expected too.

How do I test this?

Rob
-- 
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds


More information about the uClibc mailing list