uClibc-0.9.30.3-rc1

Austin Foxley austinf at cetoncorp.com
Wed Mar 3 23:10:57 UTC 2010


On 03/03/2010 03:04 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 02:44:38PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>> Because efforts would be spend on releasing .31 and merging/ creating
>> another RC immediately after
>> will divide the efforts.
> 
> I would like a release that works on m68k.  The current master tree does.
> So why wait for NPTL?

Because NPTL won't (crosses fingers) break it. You would be able to
continue to use lt/lt.old on m68k even without nptl support.

> Now if NPTL can go in an get working in a month or so, then sure I could
> see waiting for that.  It it is going to be 6 to 12 month or more then
> I certainly can't see waiting for that.

I would estimate we could get it in and tested well enough in the time
frame Bernhard mentioned for .31.

-Austin


More information about the uClibc mailing list