sigaction.h header in NPTL branch

[Carmelo AMOROSO]

On 4/26/2010 6:58 PM, Scott Esters wrote:
>  Is there a compelling reason for keeping the older style sigaction.h
> header in the ARM NPTL branch, but using the newer sigaction.h header in
> the standard uClibc release?  I've read through the archives but have not
> gleaned a reason they're different.
> 
>  Thanks,
>  Scott Esters, AF6RT

Hi, there is not an ARM NPTL branch... may you specify exactly the full
path of the header you are referring too ?

carmelo

>  
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc