[PATCH] implement futimes

Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Mon Nov 23 08:55:10 UTC 2009


On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 07:29:21PM -0800, Austin Foxley wrote:
>On 11/22/2009 07:26 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>On Sunday 22 November 2009 22:19:47 Austin Foxley wrote:
>>>First step towards sanity: Let me commit the nptl_merge branch to
>>>master. If you haven't looked at it, I've got all the relevant changes
>>>for nptl grouped into related commits, and it's up to date with master
>>>as of today.
>>>
>>>I'm going ahead with Step 1 in a day or so, unless someone yells loudly.
>>
>>i would like to go through it first, at least as a "fresh set of eyes".  i
>>dont want to see more accidental merge commits throwing out good code.
>>-mike
>
>That's fine (and I was hoping for that).

A couple of things should be fixed _before_ NPTL can be merged into
master:

- The way nptl headers are handled in the buildsystem has to be
  sanitized (see how LT{,.old} do it).
- We do _not_ care about !__STDC__ compilers, i.e. drop all of those
  old-style definitions: some_t foo(name1) void*name1;{}
- thorough review of the whole thing


More information about the uClibc mailing list