nptl branch going away, use nptl_merge

[Carmelo AMOROSO]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Austin Foxley wrote:
> For my own sanity, I'm killing (renaming) the non master based nptl
> branch. The difference of effort in keeping the two synced to master is
> quite significant.
> 
> For the master based nptl_merge, all I have to do is a
> 'git merge origin/master' and fixup any conflicts. Done.
> For the old nptl branch, I have to cherry pick every commit by hand.

I'll help as mush as I can... as for your case, the problem is time.

> I have so little time to work on uClibc, that I would rather spend it
> actually fixing problems, than just doing very manual syncing work...
> 
> Carmelo, I'm going to apply your sh4 string functions to nptl_merge as
> they are the only outstanding difference between the two.
> 

Austin,
they will apply (I did on my own copy) without problem.
They won't build on master anyway due to missing ENTRY() macro in sh/sysdeps that are defined into the nptl part only,
that's clearly not the best.
So I'll move them into a libc/sysdeps specific part and commit into master too.

So, please go ahead.

Carmelo

> -Austin
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAksKK5wACgkQoRq/3BrK1s+VXQCg6xYdPNt/6l3O91zZ3gSPGWjm
dQcAoIb5T3iVqOCOXUJq6hdFsJWlovap
=OWS8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----