[PATCH] realpath: SUSv4 compliant

Rob Landley rob at landley.net
Thu Nov 19 21:24:58 UTC 2009


On Thursday 19 November 2009 02:46:38 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 06:31:40PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> >Why  is the __nonnull(2) still there?  Isn't the point of this to ensure
> > that the second argument _can_ be null?
>
> Please read the whole thread,

Um, I thought I did read the whole thread.  Did I miss messages?  (You posted 
on November 12th, Peter Kjellerstedt responded with two comments (multiple 
variables on one line, allocated path never used), you went "right that should 
have read" and a one line changing the assignment of allocated_path, and then 
you posted a new patch in reply to that message.)

Ah, I see, the second patch you posted in reply to Peter's comments had 
unrelated changes made silently, and this was one.  My bad, sorry I missed 
that.

Rob
-- 
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds


More information about the uClibc mailing list