Grim state of libpthread (needs serious cleanup)
Carmelo AMOROSO
carmelo.amoroso at st.com
Wed Mar 25 11:19:34 UTC 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
rhabarber1848 wrote:
> Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>
>> I think that improving NPTL would be a good thing, i suppose that
>> we ultimately want to abandon the other impls in favour of it, at
>> least mid- or long-term.
>
> Hi,
>
> would it then still be possible to use uClibc with Linux kernel 2.4.x?
I'm wondering if does it make sense n 2009 still using kernel 2.4...
just a my opinion.
> Especially in the embedded sector kernel 2.4 is often used because it is
> smaller than 2.6.
>
embedded worlds is now moving to NAND, and size will not longer a big
deal. And what about performance ? O(1) scheduler that came with kernel
2.6, just to talk about one of the most important change in 2.6 series ?
should not be the time to upgrade ?
> Greetings, rhabarber1848
>
Carmelo
>
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAknKE0YACgkQoRq/3BrK1s/GpwCeNHZ+CKJBxiVswuhHBQ4p8Sl+
vJoAoLwlVt/ykeGYYchI2f/N5LZBzvoR
=S7FL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the uClibc
mailing list