ldouble math

Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Thu Mar 5 17:50:33 UTC 2009


On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 07:58:21AM -0800, Ned Ludd wrote:
>On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 12:07 +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:07:43AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> >Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> >aldot at uclibc.org wrote:
>> >> Author: aldot
>> >> Date: 2008-10-03 07:24:28 -0700 (Fri, 03 Oct 2008)
>> >> New Revision: 23582
>> >> 
>> >> Log:
>> >> - add long double math wrappers (Ned Ludd)
>> 
>> >Hi Berhard,
>> >any reason I don't know for not having include TARGET_sh among
>> >archs supporting long double ?
>> 
>> I do not immediately see why there is any arch limit.
>> 
>> Solar, why was this long double math support arch specific?
>
>I'm not aware of any reason why TARGET_sh would need to be filtered. It
>was probably an oversight.
>
>Anything break when enabled?

Does anybody remember the story behind __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH?
Let's take powerpc32 as an example. Can sombody please show be
$ nm -D /lib/libm.so.* | grep finite
from some recent glibc's libm on a powerpc32?
To be specific, i want to know if that one contains finitel or not.
If it does, please show me the disas of it.


More information about the uClibc mailing list