uclibc MIPS NPTL

Austin Foxley austinf at cetoncorp.com
Thu Jun 4 05:40:18 UTC 2009


On 06/03/2009 06:24 PM, Dan E wrote:
> For my evolving purposes, however, having a usable NPTL branch uClibc is
> no longer good enough.  I have a need for it to be working in a more
> recent release of uClibc.  The NPTL branch isn't up to snuff for some of
> my other requirements; it's just too old.  

What specific area(s) are old still?

-Austin


More information about the uClibc mailing list