[PATCH/RFC] syscall: unify common syscall defines
Michal Simek
monstr at monstr.eu
Thu Jul 9 10:30:45 UTC 2009
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 18:09:23 John Williams wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Mike Frysinger<vapier at gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 08:10:04 Michal Simek wrote:
>>>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>>> that leaves us with this arch list that need to get updated:
>>>>> alpha/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>> e1/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>> frv/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>> h8300/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>> i960/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>> microblaze/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>> nios/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>> nios2/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>> sh64/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>> v850/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>> vax/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>>
>>>>> of these, only vax/sh64 has a maintainer listed, so i say let them
>>>>> break until someone can step up and fix it. i'll probably fix up
>>>>> alpha myself, but that is the only hardware in this list that i have.
>>>> We will take care about Microblaze. We use one of latest version but I
>>>> don't have a time to fix it right now.
>>> sounds like Microblaze needs to have a maintainer listed ? or at least a
>>> mailing list ?
>> For now please just add the mailing list -
>> microblaze-uclinux at itee.uq.edu.au
>
> well how about you just update that file when pushing the next set of
> microblaze updates ;)
I wrote it to my uClibc to-do list. We will do it.
Thanks,
Michal
>
>> Further to what Michal said, we've got a set of patches that gets
>> microblaze up to 0.9.30.1. I looked at getting to the head, but had
>> some issues implementing INLINE_SYSCALL etc. Our gcc/binutils didn't
>> like named constraint registers in inline asm, and I didn't have time
>> to go further.
>>
>> We've got a bunch of kernel stuff we're working on at the moment but
>> we'll get to uClibc sooner or later.
>
> np, thanks
> -mike
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
More information about the uClibc
mailing list