[PATCH/RFC] syscall: unify common syscall defines

[Michal Simek]

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 18:09:23 John Williams wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Mike Frysinger<vapier at gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 08:10:04 Michal Simek wrote:
>>>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>>> that leaves us with this arch list that need to get updated:
>>>>>         alpha/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>>         e1/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>>         frv/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>>         h8300/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>>         i960/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>>         microblaze/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>>         nios/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>>         nios2/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>>         sh64/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>>         v850/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>>         vax/bits/syscalls.h
>>>>>
>>>>> of these, only vax/sh64 has a maintainer listed, so i say let them
>>>>> break until someone can step up and fix it.  i'll probably fix up
>>>>> alpha myself, but that is the only hardware in this list that i have.
>>>> We will take care about Microblaze. We use one of latest version but I
>>>> don't have a time to fix it right now.
>>> sounds like Microblaze needs to have a maintainer listed ?  or at least a
>>> mailing list ?
>> For now please just add the mailing list -
>> microblaze-uclinux at itee.uq.edu.au
> 
> well how about you just update that file when pushing the next set of 
> microblaze updates ;)

I wrote it to my uClibc to-do list. We will do it.

Thanks,
Michal

> 
>> Further to what Michal said, we've got a set of patches that gets
>> microblaze up to 0.9.30.1.  I looked at getting to the head, but had
>> some issues implementing INLINE_SYSCALL etc.  Our gcc/binutils didn't
>> like named constraint registers in inline asm, and I didn't have time
>> to go further.
>>
>> We've got a bunch of kernel stuff we're working on at the moment but
>> we'll get to uClibc sooner or later.
> 
> np, thanks
> -mike


-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854