[patch] Fix m68k syscalls

[Mike Frysinger]

On Tuesday 04 August 2009 15:28:04 Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 22 July 2009 10:49:00 Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> >>> As described in thread
> >>> http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2009-July/042670.html, uClibc
> >>> build is currently broken on m68k.  The attached patch ports relevant
> >>> pieces of syscall handling from recent GLIBC thus fixing the problem.
> >>
> >> please try the patch i posted as yours appears to contain a lot of
> >> stuff that the unification patch was supposed to, well, unify:
> >> http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2009-July/042714.html
> >
> > I didn't notice your patch before.  Do you plan to check it in soon?
> >
> >> also, do you really need your own syscall.[cS] ?  wont the common
> >> syscall.c work for you now ?
> >
> > It should work fine.  In fact, my intention was to unify code from GLIBC
> > and uClibc ;).
>
> I've added a couple of tweaks (removed syscall.c) to your patch and
> verified that it builds on m68k.  I didn't do runtime testing at this
> point, but I will sometime later.
>
> FWIW, I eyeballed the patch and the common code and didn't spot any
> problems.  Do you necessarily need confirmation that runtime tests pass
> or can you check in the patch as is?

i'd be nice, but really i want someone who actually understands m68k to say it 
looks sane.  since it's been this long, i'll go ahead and merge it.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20090813/03653a96/attachment.pgp>