HEADS UP: svn->git transition
Bernd Schmidt
bernds_cb1 at t-online.de
Thu Apr 30 18:35:17 UTC 2009
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 30 April 2009 08:57:14 Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> You use "git fetch" to update the local repository with the latest
>>> changes from the remote repository, then use "git rebase origin/master"
>>> to rebase all local commits onto the master branch of the origin
>>> repository. origin/master can of course be substituted with any other
>>> branch as well.
>>>
>>> After that you can "git push" your new branch to the remote repository.
>> That seems to have worked. Still, I have to ask: Do people really find
>> this easier and more reliable to use than "svn update"?
>
> migrating to git from svn isnt because we think the pushing/pulling steps are
> simpler -- everyone knows git/dscms are more complicated in this regard and a
> noticeable hurdle for people who have only worked with centralized scms. the
> reasons for git over svn were covered earlier in the thread. in my mind, git
> is the hands down solution for these projects.
Well, ease of use was among the reasons listed. I find this puzzling as
my experience with git has been one of incomprehensible error messages
and repo corruption at the slightest provocation. However, I don't
contribute enough to uClibc for it to be a major inconvenience for me.
Bernd
--
This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers.
Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft Muenchen, Registergericht Muenchen HRB 40368
Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif
More information about the uClibc
mailing list