NPTL on x86, anyone?

[Carmelo AMOROSO]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Timo Teräs wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Friday 10 April 2009 01:07:52 Timo Teräs wrote:
>>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>> On Thursday 09 April 2009 10:24:53 Cristi Magherusan wrote:
>>>>> Is there anyone interested in porting the NPTL branch to x86/x86-64?
>>>> always interested in accepting patches, but no one appears to be
>>>> interested in doing the porting work atm
>>> Did you all miss the mail I sent yesterday?
>>>
>>> http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2009-April/042289.html
>> i saw it, but i generally skim over things that make me go to an external 
>> location
> 
> The patch is about 70 kB. I find it good practice to send large
> (as in over 40-50kB) patches as URLs instead of as attachment/inline.
> 
> But I can send it as attachment too if wanted.
> 
> I just noticed that some changes there are probably not right
> based on the recent MIPS patch discussion.
> E.g. pthread_cleanup_push_defer related things.
> 
> Also wondering if the NPTL version is planned for update? The
> nptl branch is based on pretty old snapshot.
> 
> - Timo
This is defintely in my plan, but not before NPTL has been merged
into trunk; so it will happen later... hopefully few months.

Unfortunately, due to other more urgent task on my side, I've
stopped creating the patches to move TLS and other code from nptl
branch to trunk. I hope to restart asap.

cheers,
carmelo
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkne5SoACgkQoRq/3BrK1s/76wCeJWkTNRUUHlbQcLNgAHtoLIyG
8DsAn1eWJcdtRGnKHlnAlsiwt6CgVWlo
=LA9c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----