confirmed working NPTL revision?

[Carmelo AMOROSO]

Will Newton wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO <carmelo.amoroso at st.com> wrote:
> 
>>> 1) How platform specific is it?
>> Fully, TLS relocations are different from one arch to another.
>>
>>> 2) Does it actually have anything to do with nptl?
>>>
>> Nothing, just dynamic linker, and obviously your compiler has to
>> recognize the __thread keyword.
> 
> I was under the impression that TLS support was a requirement of
> implementing NPTL, is that not the case?
> 
> http://www.linux-mips.org/wiki/NPTL
> 
but it can live without nptl.