Fwd: Cannot build uclibc++ against toolchain (dl_iterate_phdr & __tls_get_addr)

[Carmelo AMOROSO]

Rob Landley wrote:
> On Monday 27 October 2008 15:02:19 Rob Landley wrote:
>> On Monday 27 October 2008 12:50:13 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>> Sorry for having confused with multiple patches/proposal and emails.
>>> Currently the dl_iterate_phdr symbols is defined in ld-uClibc.so.0 and
>>> libdl.a. The idea is to move into libc.so.0 and libc.a (exactly as glibc
>>> does).
>> Well, that sounds like a good thing all by itself.  Why is uClibc defining
>> it in a different place than glibc does right now?  (And why don't more
>> programs break due to that?)
>>
>> For one thing, a statically linked program would never get dl_iterate_phdr
>> right now, right?  (What does that symbol _do_, anyway?  Is there some
>> documentation I should read up on somewhere?)
> 
> it turns out there's an existing gentoo bug on this:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/117523
> 
> So yes, I think your patch should be applied (probably to 0.9.30.1):
> http://www.uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2008-January/018969.html
> 
> Rob
> 
Hi Rob,
finally I've got some time to review and commit my old patch to move 
_dl_iterate_phdr into libc.{so,a}.
Committed on trunk rev 24090.

Cheers,
Carmelo