Segfault in re_string_reconstruct()

[Arnar Mar Sigurðsson]

-----Original Message-----
From: uclibc-bounces at uclibc.org on behalf of Peter Korsgaard
Sent: Tue 11/4/2008 10:53 AM
To: Hans-Christian Egtvedt
Cc: uclibc at uclibc.org
Subject: Re: Segfault in re_string_reconstruct()
 
>>>>> "Hans-Christian" == Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt at atmel.com> writes:

> Hans-Christian> It works with the toolchain built by the AVR32 fork()
> Hans-Christian> of Buildroot. My preferred way is to get the
> Hans-Christian> toolchain upstream and have a minimal/none small
> Hans-Christian> patches in Buildroot.

> Great, that's also by far my preferred solution.

> So this probably means that we should mark avr32 as broken in the
> uclibc.org buildroot for now?
avr32 is working fine in the latest buildroot. I'm running the v100sc2_defconfg target on a ngw100 board and everything is working.



-----Original Message-----
From: uclibc-bounces at uclibc.org on behalf of Hans-Christian Egtvedt
Sent: Tue 11/4/2008 7:10 AM
To: Peter Korsgaard
Cc: uclibc at uclibc.org
Subject: Re: Segfault in re_string_reconstruct()
 
> It seems like some GCC patches are missing
> in ./toolchain/gcc/ext_source/Atmel/avr32/4.2.2-avr32-2.1.5
> only 903, 904 and 905 are present from the incremental patches to the
> last release. Perhaps the 901 and 902 patch is included in the tarball?
901 and 902 are included with in the prepatched source that Ulf created. I added 904 and 905 and thous fixed a Qt crash i was having.

> Also, uClibc and binutils are missing patches
> ./toolchain/uClibc/ext_source/Atmel/avr32 <- the 0.9.29 dirs are empty
> toolchain/binutils/ext_source/Atmel/avr32 <- the 2.17 dirs are empty
> I do not use the external toolchain stuff, hence I do not subject it to
> testing.

When Ulf removed the avr32 patches he made it really hard to fallow the Atmel patches.
1) He created his own version numbers to stamp the prepatched source with.
2) I can find no where what patches are included in the prepatched source

I would like to go back to the way before Ulf's changes and include all the Atmel patches and build the same way other archs build (without the ext_source mess), it will make it much easier to include the atmel patches in the future. But some persons dont like one time download of a <1MB patch...

Greets
   Arnar Mar Sig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://busybox.net/lists/uclibc/attachments/20081104/153e16ce/attachment.htm