No subject

For example, glibc contains an implementation of the wordexp() function, in compliance with the Single Unix Specification, version 3. Well, standards are important. But so is pragmatism. The wordexp function is huge, yet I am not aware of even one Linux application that uses it! So uClibc doesn't provide wordexp(). There are many similar examples.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So I wonder the standard test cases for linux can match uClibc testing.
Could you please give me some clues for complet testing for uClibc?


-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Andersen [mailto:andersen at codepoet.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Chen Qi-A18263
Cc: uclibc at uclibc.org
Subject: Re: [uClibc]Is there any function list/category for uclibc?


On Wed Jan 15, 2003 at 12:11:55PM +0800, Chen Qi-A18263 wrote:
> Hi, Erik:
> 
> 	Thanks for your suggestions.
> 	BTW, I noticed that there are a test folder in uClibc Package. Which contain subfolders such as math, string, etc..
> 	I wonder if the content in this folder is complete to test the uClibc?

no, it is not complete...  You may want to look at
    http://ltp.sourceforge.net/
as their tests are much more comprehensive.

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--