__uclibc_mutex_unlock
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Sat Jan 6 22:57:23 UTC 2007
On Friday 05 January 2007 9:10 pm, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Did some digging into the ARM SEGV landly has seen
> > recently and this makes me wounder:
...
> Took a crack at fixing this but I am too tiered(and lazy)
> to test it.
Query, are you attempting to fix the segfault I'm seeing or something else you
discovered while looking at the code? (Are you saying if I apply this patch
instead of the one I'm applying, it might also make the armv4l segfault go
away?)
Also, about the first hunk: is a typecast that ugly really necessary, and
does it look wordwrap damaged to anybody else?
Rob
--
"Perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but
when there is no longer anything to take away." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
More information about the uClibc
mailing list