[PATCH] Re: readahead offset type (re: mantis 0001024)

[Mike Frysinger]

On Thursday 01 February 2007, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> Either way, behaviour should imho be consistent, and it is not, from a
> quick grep for ENOSYS. Didn't really look, admittedly.

it isnt by any means

> Not stubbing unsupported functions out sounds smaller. Deciding what
> route to take, either to stub them out or making them not available
> isn't my call, though.

it should be a config option defaulting to off
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20070201/0ed9d2cf/attachment-0002.pgp