Uclibc and blackfin

Rob Landley rob at landley.net
Mon Aug 13 06:26:16 UTC 2007


On Sunday 12 August 2007 7:41:47 pm Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Koen Kooi wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Rob Landley schreef:
> >> If there are patches against mainline that add blackfin support to the
> >> most recent release version of gcc, I'll happily test them.  But
> >> starting from a separate tarball is uninteresting.
> >
> > Mainline gcc already support blackfin (from 4.0.x iirc), but not the
> > extra funky command line options like -mfdpic or -mleaf-shared-id. I just
> > succesfully built (well, OE built it) the uclibc fork with a pretty
> > vanilla gcc 4.2.1 and the elf2flt wrapper.
>
> I can only repeat my advice that by doing so, you won't actually get
> binaries that work with our uClinux distribution.  Please use the
> binaries from our web page.

But can I get binaries that run on the hardware if I build my own kernel and C 
library?

I'm interested in getting binaries that work with the hardware and which I can 
reproduce from standard sources.  I'm trying to build the same software 
across as many different platforms as possible.  Platforms that can't do this 
because they're "special" remind me of the "special olympics" and "very 
special episode" uses of the word special.

But I'm probably not your target audience. :)

> Bernd

Rob
-- 
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
  - Ken Thompson.



More information about the uClibc mailing list