uClibc-20060901 and binary size
Mike Frysinger
vapier at gentoo.org
Sat Oct 21 05:39:04 UTC 2006
On Friday 20 October 2006 18:52, nunash wrote:
> Any ideas why 20060901 is producing larger binaries?
we would really be taking stabs in the dark without seeing an example app from
you
sounds like some symbols that you arent actually using are getting pulled into
the final binary
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20061021/421917e5/attachment-0002.pgp
More information about the uClibc
mailing list