Long release cycle (was: RE: uclibc tool chain installation problem)

[Erik Andersen]

On Tue Mar 21, 2006 at 09:42:00AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 March 2006 04:17, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
> > A release cycle of one to two months rather than once a year
> > would be much appreciated.  That way, if we incorporate a new
> > version and find some problems with it, we won't have to wait
> > a year to have them officially fixed...
> 
> putting trunk on such a release schedule doesnt really "solve" things imo ...
> 
> since we have svn now, doing branches/tags should be quite trivial ... i 
> wouldnt mind seeing the next release, 0.9.29, created as a branch and then as 
> any minor bugfixes are found, doing tags of like 0.9.29.1, 0.9.29.2, etc...
> 
> of course, i'll defer to whatever Erik sees fit ;)

Certainly works for me.  And I would like to see us getting
a release out in the very near future.  Its definately been
overly long since the last one.

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--