[patch] ARM EABI support

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:

> vapier applied it, I have done some modifications. If UCLIBC_HAS_WCHAR is 
> not defined, MB_CUR_MAX is undefined. what should happen then? is 
> #undef MB_CUR_MAX
> #define MB_CUR_MAX 1
> 
> ok for __eaabi_MB_CUR_MAX ?

I just disabled building aeabi_mb_cur_max.c unless UCLIBC_HAS_WCHAR is set 
(the configuration I tested in fact didn't have UCLIBC_HAS_WCHAR enabled).  
I don't see a problem with using 1 as the definition if you wish to do so, 
but neither do I see a problem with defining MB_CUR_MAX to 1 in that case 
rather than having it undefined in the header.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph at codesourcery.com