Retiring from uClibc development

[Paul Mundt]

On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:18:42PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 April 2006 13:11, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > This leaves e1 frv h8300 i960 nios sh64 v850 and vax as arches
> > with questionable developer support.
> 
> sh64 is in limbo due to the state of the respective flux in silicon
> 
The more significant issue is toolchain-specific, specifically gcc. The
gcc port has been getting a bit dated, and has also started having
problems getting the kernel to build these days, which is something
that's higher on my priority list than the uClibc backend.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20060411/e304763a/attachment-0002.pgp