"Difference beetween uClibc and Glibc?"
Rich Felker
dalias at aerifal.cx
Mon Apr 10 04:05:39 UTC 2006
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 08:17:17PM +0200, Michael Hunold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09.04.2006 07:44 Rich Felker said the following:
> > On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 02:59:27AM +0200, Aurelien Jacobs wrote:
> >
> >>>>By the way, on my system, the following commands returns
> >>>>only zeros :
> >>>>cat /proc/*/statm | cut -d' ' -f7
> >>>
> >>>Right. Your system is broken...
> >>
> >>Could you elaborate please ?
> >>I tried it on 8 different hosts (various kernel versions, arch, distro)
> >>and get the same result on all of them ! (ie. no dirty page at all)
> >
> >
> > I don't know except that I'm sure it's incorrect. Maybe it's broken in
> > all 2.6 versions..? I use 2.4.
>
> Google for "stam deprectated" or "statm worth fixing". There have been
> discussions ongoing since 2003, because changes made some of the fields
> in statm meaningless in 2.6.
Does "top" even work on 2.6 then? All of its data comes from statm...
Rich
More information about the uClibc
mailing list