[uClibc] linux kernels

Manuel Novoa III mjn3 at codepoet.org
Mon Mar 21 23:36:32 UTC 2005


You'd be better off trying to build and fixing the issues you encounter.

Manuel

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:13:57PM -0600, Erick Tyndall wrote:
> No old archive of uclibc's from the dark days?
> 
> >From: mjn3 at codepoet.org (Manuel Novoa III)
> >To: Erick Tyndall <erythros at hotmail.com>
> >CC: ralphs at netwinder.org, uclibc at uclibc.org
> >Subject: Re: [uClibc] linux kernels
> >Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:48:30 -0700
> >
> >Not so much a buildroot issue.  Current uClibc's probably can't build
> >with 2.0.40 or 2.2.26 kernel headers.
> >
> >Manuel
> >
> >On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:32:11PM -0600, Erick Tyndall wrote:
> >>
> >> >From: Ralph Siemsen <ralphs at netwinder.org>
> >> >To: Erick Tyndall <erythros at hotmail.com>
> >> >CC: uclibc at uclibc.org
> >> >Subject: Re: [uClibc] linux kernels
> >> >Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:37:42 -0500
> >> >
> >> >Erick Tyndall wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>so my first question is where can i find the dependencies/requirements
> >> >>for a kernel 2.0.40 and 2.2.26 compile?
> >> >
> >> >Wow, those are OLD kernels :)  Even 2.4 is considered old, but still
> >> >supported.  To compile these you will want to find a toolchain of
> >> >comparable age.  For 2.0 and 2.2 kernels, you'll want to go back to
> >> >gcc-2.95 series, or back into the egcs series, most likely.  I am not 
> >sure
> >> >how much luck you'll have using the toolchain from buildroot for this
> >> >(I've never tried though).
> >> >
> >> >-Ralph
> >> >
> >>
> >> I was afraid of that. Thank you anyways. Maybe I can find an old 
> >buildroot
> >> from the 2.2 days...
> >>
> >>
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> uClibc mailing list
> >> uClibc at uclibc.org
> >> http://uclibc.org/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
> >
> 
> 

> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://uclibc.org/mailman/listinfo/uclibc




More information about the uClibc mailing list