[uClibc] 2.95 anyone?

David DeHaven daved at bacomatic.org
Tue Mar 15 21:38:16 UTC 2005


> Stupid project relies too heavily on 2.95, even 3.2.x doesn't seem to 
> be happy. Need 2.95 to get things started so I can fix it without 
> breaking things.

Nevermind, rampant misuse of __FUNCTION__ was making life miserable. 
It's building with gcc 3.4.2 now.

-DrD-




More information about the uClibc mailing list