[uClibc] RE: [uClibc-cvs] svn commit: trunk/uClibc/ldso/ldso: arm cris i386 m68k mips powerpc sh sh64 etc...

Erik Andersen andersen at codepoet.org
Tue Mar 15 18:17:12 UTC 2005


On Tue Mar 15, 2005 at 12:06:39PM +0200, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:48:14AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > yeah, I should have mailed the list first in this case, sorry.
> > Regarding mailing the "concerned parties" it is easier said than done.
> > I am not aware of any file/list that names "concerned parties" for
> > uClibc. I think that the uClibc ml will have to do.
> > 
> This is certainly a valid concern. It would be beneficial to have
> individual contact points for architectures and appropriate subsystems as
> not everyone has the time to follow the mailing list (I probably wouldn't
> have even noticed this on uclibc-cvs if I didn't have time to kill at the
> airport..).
> 
> Erik, what about adding a top-level MAINTAINERS or something that will
> address this problem? It seems like the list should be small enough, as
> it's really the architectures that are of the biggest interest in this
> regard. It would be beneficial at least for those of us with a minor
> interest in keeping our architectures working.

Done -- I just checked in a first draft pass at a MAINTAINERS
list.....  Feel free to add fixes as needed.

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20050315/0f26d519/attachment-0002.pgp 


More information about the uClibc mailing list