[uClibc] Buildroot package placement policy/style question...
Erik Andersen
andersen at codepoet.org
Wed Jan 19 06:30:56 UTC 2005
On Tue Jan 18, 2005 at 06:50:10PM -0700, George Joseph wrote:
> Hmmm. I didn't realize sed went both ways.
>
> Seems to be two options then...
>
> A: Like "sed" ... Common config/make in package with an option to build for build host, target host or both.
>
> B: Two completely separate instances. For the target host, put the config/make in package and build in build_*. For the build
> host, put the config/make in target with the other toolchain stuff and build in toolchain_build_*.
I'd rather not have two instances of anything. For packages that
need to swing both ways and are not toolchain components, I'd
rather have a package/foo/ item with Makefile rules for both host
and target (i.e. 'foo' and 'foo-host'), and then have any target
specific makefiles depend on 'foo-host'.
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the uClibc
mailing list